If you actually went to Xinjiang and asked the Uyghur people themselves (which you can actually do), I think you would find that they’re very happy for the terrorist attacks to have ended. You can visit their neighborhoods and their markets and their mosques and ask them yourself.
Also yet to refute UN’s claim.
Have you forgotten the start of this conversation, where the UN put this to issue to bed two years ago? The only people interested in this is the US propaganda machine. And they don’t actually give a rat’s ass about the Uyghur people any more than the Palestinian people. They only push this narrative to manufacture consent for their new Cold War with China.
If you actually went to Xinjiang and asked the Uyghur people themselves
When a country have such an abysmal score on human right and freedom of express, i’d take whatever people inside China said with a huge spoon of salt, as well as any country official that took the guided tour of the region. I’m not sure who will answer no when asked about whether they’re happy with no violence occuring, but i bet you can ask Israeli the same exact question before 7th oct and they will be happy that Palestinian are being kept in such way that violate the human right.
the UN put this to issue to bed two years ago
Refused to talk is put the issue to bed? Isn’t this like when US veto-ed all those ceasefire talk about Israel genocide?
So far it’s just deflecting and deflecting. Why not just straight away and tell me you don’t have any evidence to proof that China didn’t do what they got accused of? Might save us some time going back and forth.
I posted any number of links to information on what actually happened at the beginning of this conversation, but you’re not going to engage with any of them, because you’re not actually interested in what actually happened; you’re interested in winning a debate on the internet. But the two or three people who are still reading this thread don’t seem to be impressed with your unserious line of argument.
Why would i engage on deflection? You’re not even trying to proof the finding wrong, merely justifying the reason, which is admitting human right violation indeed happened within China. And i have no desire to impress anyone from this instance.
If you actually went to Xinjiang and asked the Uyghur people themselves (which you can actually do), I think you would find that they’re very happy for the terrorist attacks to have ended. You can visit their neighborhoods and their markets and their mosques and ask them yourself.
Have you forgotten the start of this conversation, where the UN put this to issue to bed two years ago? The only people interested in this is the US propaganda machine. And they don’t actually give a rat’s ass about the Uyghur people any more than the Palestinian people. They only push this narrative to manufacture consent for their new Cold War with China.
When a country have such an abysmal score on human right and freedom of express, i’d take whatever people inside China said with a huge spoon of salt, as well as any country official that took the guided tour of the region. I’m not sure who will answer no when asked about whether they’re happy with no violence occuring, but i bet you can ask Israeli the same exact question before 7th oct and they will be happy that Palestinian are being kept in such way that violate the human right.
Refused to talk is put the issue to bed? Isn’t this like when US veto-ed all those ceasefire talk about Israel genocide?
Amnesty International is funded by Western capitalists and by Western imperialist states (which are themselves run by Western capitalists[1][2]), so it can shove its opinions on socialist, anti-imperialist states up its ass. It is part of the human rights concern troll industrial complex.
So far it’s just deflecting and deflecting. Why not just straight away and tell me you don’t have any evidence to proof that China didn’t do what they got accused of? Might save us some time going back and forth.
I posted any number of links to information on what actually happened at the beginning of this conversation, but you’re not going to engage with any of them, because you’re not actually interested in what actually happened; you’re interested in winning a debate on the internet. But the two or three people who are still reading this thread don’t seem to be impressed with your unserious line of argument.
Why would i engage on deflection? You’re not even trying to proof the finding wrong, merely justifying the reason, which is admitting human right violation indeed happened within China. And i have no desire to impress anyone from this instance.