WASHINGTON, Nov 17 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden’s administration will allow Ukraine to use U.S.-provided weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, three sources familiar with the matter said, in a significant change to Washington’s policy in the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

Ukraine plans to conduct its first long-range attacks in the coming days, the sources said, without revealing details due to operational security concerns.

The move by the United States two months before President-elect Donald Trump takes office on Jan. 20 follows months of requests by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to allow Ukraine’s military to use U.S. weapons to hit Russian military targets far from its border.

The change follows Russia’s deployment of North Korean ground troops to supplement its own forces, a development that has caused alarm in Washington and Kyiv.

The first deep strikes are likely to be carried out using ATACMS rockets, which have a range of up to 190 miles (306 km), according to the sources.

  • pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    The craziest thing of our time is that right-wing bigots claim to end the war fast with peace talks, while so-called “progressives” are going to prolong their proxy war as long as there is at least one Ukrainian still alive.

    • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      End the war fast by giving up land, and the people on that land. If you know anything about history Ukrainians under Russian rule is a completely unacceptable outcome to anyone but complete psychopaths.

  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’ve said this before on this issue, but why is Biden still president and allowed to make these descions? The world finally forced to realize that his brain is pudding but they just let him stay president and make descions that could lead to war with the Russian Federation. Its completely depraved

    • ouch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Bad news mate. WW3 already started a while ago. The world is essentially in a proxy war against Russia.

  • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well, at least we know where the Democrats’ priorities are.

    Foreign policy: Escalation of global war.
    Domestic policy: thoughts and prayers

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If this is true, this is an act of absolute insanity on the part of Biden admin. This would be an act of war from Russian perspective. Russians repeatedly stated that these weapons can only be operated by NATO personnel, and the use of these weapons would mean direct attack by NATO on Russia. Furthermore, since tomahawks can carry a nuclear pay load, the launches of these missiles will be viewed as a nuclear attack. Russians aren’t gonna wait and see whether a nuclear capable missile actually had a nuke payload or not before they respond.

    • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      Oh please. We’ve crossed every red line Putin has and nothing has happened. Nothing will happen here, “Russians said”, give me a break.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        The only previous red line Russia actually outlined was Ukraine joining NATO, and when that line was crossed the war started. All these other “red lines” were made up by western propagandists and don’t actually come from Russia.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Furthermore, since tomahawks can carry a nuclear pay load, the launches of these missiles will be viewed as a nuclear attack.

      What are you talking about? When did US delicer tomahawks?

      At least get your facts straight lol

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Tomahawks was the ones discussed recently, however ATACMS can also carry nukes. So, not sure what facts you think aren’t straight lol.

  • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    they didn’t worked within ukraine, what makes them believe they’re gonna work within russia.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      One interesting explanation from Mohammed Mirandi was the establishment wants to escalate as much as possible to prevent Russia from accepting de escalation when Trump comes to power without major concessions from Ukraine.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    three sources familiar with the matter

    Anonymous sources. On the one hand, this is weak tea, but on the other, I wouldn’t put it past the Biden administration at all.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Reuters and NYT are reporting it. Those outlets get their talking points straight from the white house. There is little reason to doubt this.

    • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Things were going way too quietly since the election. This is probably the first step towards starting the major conflict